There are two major reporting styles or approaches to reporting findings from studies: author-focused and information-focused. Here are the features of both styles:
Author-focused | Information-focused |
|
|
In author-prominent citations, the author focus can be either:
Below are examples of reporting language that is employed to provide a review of studies following the author- and information-prominent styles of reporting. Note that both active and passive verb forms are common, and tense choice tends to be flexible depending on the pattern.
The author-focused style: Emphasizing what particular author(s) did or accomplished in a single study. Note the variety of reporting verbs that reflect the author’s “actions” in experiments, opinions, statements, judgment, suggestions, and disagreement. The Past Simple tense is used predominantly to refer to specific studies, the authors’ activity at a specific moment in the past, and particular findings from these studies.
Author(s) + Year |
Reporting verb + object |
|
Smith (2010) Sokolov and Adams (2014) |
affirmed challenged considered demonstrated described determined developed designed/ devised disagreed disputed emphasized examined/ studied explored/ investigated established estimated evaluated/ assessed |
explained focused/ concentrated/ centered on found gauged/ measured indicated inquired into introduced observed pointed out predicted/ forecasted presented proposed/ suggested revealed reviewed/ surveyed reported questioned |
Here are some common collocations with some of the reporting verbs from the table:
consider | the characteristics of, effect(s) of, a/the strategy for, the ground for, the possibility of |
demonstrate | the importance of, a/ the relationship(s) between, the quality of |
describe | a method, a model, a process, a scheme |
determine | facts, functions, parameters of |
develop | a hypothesis, performance measures, a strategy, a technique |
design/ devise | a method for, a statistical test, a system |
estimate | a model, a scenario of, the parameters of |
evaluate/ assess | performance, the impact of, a change in |
examine/ explore/ investigate/ study | measures of, effects of/ on, models |
focus/ concentrate/ center on | the effects of/ on, the policies, the issue of, the problem of |
gauge/ measure | changes in, the rate (level) of, the value of |
inquire into | implications of/ for, the definition of, possibilities of/ for |
introduce |
an algorithm, the concept of, a method |
observe | a change, an increase/ a decrease in, a difference, patterns in |
propose | an approach to, a solution to, a method for |
review/ survey | characteristics, evidence, themes |
When the author reports findings from a group of studies and individual studies, the Present Simple and Past Simple tenses are most frequently used. The Present Simple tense is used to talk about what authors in individual studies believe, indicate, report on, or write about:
It can also be used to report particular findings from individual studies and to interpret what the findings mean (through the author’s ‘meta-commentaries’ on what he/she is reporting).
The Past Simple tense is employed to describe some activity at a specific moment or period in the past and to report particular findings from individual studies. Note that it is not common for writers to shift between Present Simple and Past Simple as they discuss findings from studies, as this makes their style of reporting less consistent. This means it would be advisable to use either the Present Simple or Past Simple to discuss the findings but not a combination of the two for the same purpose.
The Present Perfect tense is commonly used to highlight recent developments in exploring the topic or findings obtained by specific authors:
This tense is also often employed to introduce several studies and their focus (through the opening statement) and to report particular findings from individual studies.