Expected Outcomes
1. Reporting preliminary findings
2. Language focus II
3. Language activities

Reporting preliminary findings (optional) (Move 2)

In case one has already obtained some data and conducted its preliminary analysis, one may wish to briefly report on the preliminary findings, with reference to figures and tables (if applicable). The preliminary results may turn out to be contradictory to those suggested by other scholars, reconfirm those results, and reveal new areas for investigation (research gaps) based on the issues that emerged. This part is the space to explain what the study’s findings may mean in the context of previous research on the topic, how they can advance current research, or what future avenues of research can be proposed.  

In case any interpretations of the findings should be suggested at this early stage, these are provided in connection to the study's research questions or hypothesis and previous findings in the field, with references to specific studies. The findings can be shown to complement and support earlier findings, or contradict them in some way.

To report and summarize numbers in visual form, graphs, tables, and figures can be used. These should be labelled Figure 1, Figure 2, or Table 1, Table 2, etc., with captions provided and summary statements made for each figure or table instead of describing them.

Language for referring the reader to tables and figures and summarizing graphical information

The following “reference” language is commonly used to refer the reader to visual (tables, figures, or graphs) and textual data. Note the predominant use of the Present Simple tense and various grammatical structures (including both passive and active voice structures). Note that the structures which provide a reference to the data can appear in any part of a sentence. 

  • The results from this model are presented in columns 4 and 6 of Table 1.
  • The results of the exploratory ML factor analyses performed on the within and between correlation matrices of Table 2 are reported in Table 3.
  • Table 3 shows descriptive statistics from the … sample… / contains the ratio of …
  • Table 4 presents the procedures, functions, and events developed for …
  • Figure 1/ the pie chart below illustrates that …
  • As can be seen in Tables 1 and 2, we estimated how …
  • As may be seen on the lower graph of Figure 6, there is large variation in ...
  • The results in Table 4 reveal that …
  • According to Table X/ Figure X, …
  • (the finding is stated) … (see Table/ Figure X).
  • (the finding is stated) … (Table/ Figure X)
  • (the finding is stated) …, as shown/ indicatedreportedsummarized in Table/ Figure X.
  • (the finding is stated) …, as illustrated/ shared in this comment ... (a participant’s quote is provided)
  • (the finding is stated) …, as noted/ observed by this participant ... (a participant’s quote is provided).
  • As participant #2 observed, ... (the quote is provided).
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3

Reference language I

Choose the most suitable answer for these questions:

Which tenses seem to be predominant in verbs that refer the reader to the visual data?
“Table 2 summarizes X” is an example of a ‘location’ statement. Following Swales and Feak (2012), ‘location’ statements are statements which direct the reader to where the data can be found. In which part of a sentence can the ‘location’ statements appear?
 
 

Reference language II

Match the sentence beginnings and endings to see examples of the “reference” language that is commonly used to refer the reader to visual (e.g., tables, figures, or graphs) and textual data (e.g., comments from human subjects):

Field emission from such printed films is in fact comparable to emissive nano-carbon thin films
As observed by student #3,
Two optimized designs
Table 2 presents
Participant #50 described the benefits he received from developing and presenting his projects through the years:
In comparison to Table 5,
According to Table 2,
As shown in Fig. 3,

Reference language III

Complete the gaps with the words below. Drag the words into the spaces:

reports
As participant #35 noted,
are presented
(see Table 1)
as shared
according to Table 3
we show
1. The results in Figure 2.
2. The two paradigms seem to represent very different approaches to studying temporal phenomena .
3. As in Figure 3, small errors in the camera calibration process may severely affect the estimation results.
4. Some participants had difficulty gaining access to the website, in this comment by one of the participants, “I had a hard time …”
5. Table 4 the frequency of the characteristics as included in our analyses.
6. These differences are not significant, .
7. “Presenting projects multiple times has undeniably equipped me EXTREMELY well for a professional working environment.”